The Animism Controversy Revisited: A Probability Analysis
- 1 December 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Genetic Psychology
- Vol. 123 (2) , 219-225
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1973.10532680
Abstract
Consideration was given to the methodological issues surrounding the Piaget-Huang controversy. A probability model, based on the difference between the expected and observed animistic and deanimistic responses, was suggested as an improved technique for the assessment of animism. The probability model was applied on the answers of a group of 60 children. The results indicated that an animistic tendency was prevalent among 11-year-old normals, while six-year-old normals and 11-year-old retardates had been guessing. Analysis of children's responses revealed that the type of response does not necessarily reflect the type of underlying thought process.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Animistic thought in Civilized AdultsThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1965
- Animistic Responses as a Function of Sentence Contexts and InstructionsThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1957
- The Distinction between Living and Not Living among 7–10-Year-Old Children, with Some Remarks concerning the So-Called Animism ControversyThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1957
- Animistic thinking among college and high school students in the Near East.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1957