Selecting patients for heart transplantation: which patients are too well for transplant?
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Cardiology
- Vol. 17 (2) , 137-144
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001573-200203000-00003
Abstract
In the context of contemporary medical and surgical therapy, the revolutionary procedure of cardiac transplantation should be redefined in its relative role. Based on the assumption that its goal is to prolong life while improving its quality, and in the absence of randomized clinical trial data testing its benefit, data from early breakthrough studies, more recent observational cohort studies, and studies testing other therapies in advanced heart failure must be analyzed to characterize clinical profiles of patients who should be considered too well for cardiac transplantation at specific stages of their disease processes. These profiles likely include advanced heart failure with (1) low risk according to the Heart Failure Survival Score, (2) peak oxygen consumption greater than 14 to 18 mL/kg/min without other indications, (3) left ventricular ejection fraction less than 20% alone, (4) history of New York Heart Association class III to IV symptoms alone, (5) history of ventricular arrhythmias alone, (6) no previous attempt at comprehensive neurohormonal blockade, and (7) no structured cardiac transplantation evaluation in a designated cardiac transplantation center. The evaluation may identify the potential transplant candidate, who could be placed on a national potential transplant candidate list, combining the psychologic benefit of acceptance by the program with an ongoing openness to the diversity of advanced heart failure treatment modalities.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heart transplantation indicated only in the most severely ill patient: perspectives from the German heart transplant experienceCurrent Opinion in Cardiology, 2001
- Effect of receiving a heart transplant: analysis of a national cohort entered on to a waiting list, stratified by heart failure severity Commentary: Time for a controlled trial?BMJ, 2000
- The registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: sixteenth official report—1999The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 1999
- Mortality remains high for outpatient transplant candidates with prolonged (>6 months) waiting list timeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Long-term survival in severe heart failure in patients treated with enalapril; ten year follow-up of CONSENSUS IEuropean Heart Journal, 1999
- Development and Prospective Validation of a Clinical Index to Predict Survival in Ambulatory Patients Referred for Cardiac Transplant EvaluationCirculation, 1997
- Does heart transplantation confer additional benefit over medical therapy to patients who have waited >6 months for heart transplantation?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Decreasing survival benefit from cardiac transplantation for outpatients as the waiting list lengthensJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Effects of Enalapril on Mortality in Severe Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Measuring the effectiveness of heart transplant programmes: Quality of life data and their relationship to survival analysisJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987