Cost-Effectiveness of Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 10 (1) , 23-31
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00141.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in routine practice: a European perspectiveSupportive Care in Cancer, 2004
- Nausea and Vomiting Remain a Significant Clinical ProblemJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2000
- Consensus proposal for 5HT 3 antagonists in the prevention of acute emesis related to highly emetogenic chemotherapySupportive Care in Cancer, 1998
- An Introduction to Markov Modelling for Economic EvaluationPharmacoEconomics, 1998
- Alternatives to the QALY measure for economic evaluationsSupportive Care in Cancer, 1997
- Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysisJournal of Health Economics, 1997
- Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ondansetron Versus Metoclopramide Regimens†PharmacoEconomics, 1994
- The real costs of emesis—An economic analysis of ondansetron vs. Metoclopramide in controlling emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- Comparison of the 5-Hydroxytryptamine3(Serotonin) Antagonist Ondansetron (Gr 38032F) with High-Dose Metoclopramide in the Control of Cisplatin-Induced EmesisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- On the receiving end—patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1983