Epithelial heating rates with topical ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ofloxacin with artificial tears after photorefractive keratectomy
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 26 (5) , 690-694
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00411-9
Abstract
To determine whether corneal epithelial healing differs after the use of topical ciprofloxacin alone, topical ofloxacin alone, or topical ofloxacin with artificial tears in patients having photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA. Eighteen patients (6 women, 12 men) with moderate myopia (-1.50 to -6.00 diopters [D]) had standardized PRK. Patient age ranged from 25 to 62 years. The 28 eyes (16 right, 12 left) were randomized into 3 treatment groups: ofloxacin alone, n = 9 eyes; ciprofloxacin, n = 9 eyes; and ofloxacin with Refresh Plus, n = 10 eyes. The drugs were administered immediately after surgery and then every 6 hours. Video recordings of the corneal wounds stained with fluorescein were performed at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM using a video slitlamp camera with a cobalt-blue light until the wound completely healed. The videotaped images were recorded and analyzed by a computer planimetry program. Wound areas were recorded and compared among the 3 drugs. The square-root transformation was applied to the wound area to obtain a constant healing rate. Statistical comparisons were analyzed using an analysis of variance test. Mean recovery time was 82.67 hours +/- 14.42 (SD) in the ofloxacin eyes, 120.89 +/- 34.05 hours in the ciprofloxacin eyes, and 76.80 +/- 19.30 hours in the ofloxacin with Refresh Plus eyes. Mean healing rate was 0.66 +/- 0.17 hours, 0.54 +/- 0.16 hours, and 0.67 +/- 0.15 hours, respectively. The healing rate was significantly higher in the ofloxacin with Refresh Plus eyes than in the ciprofloxacin eyes (P < .0001). There was no significant difference between the ofloxacin eyes and the ofloxacin with Refresh Plus eyes (P = .42). Ofloxacin with Refresh Plus and ofloxacin alone had a more positive effect on epithelial healing than ciprofloxacin. The ciprofloxacin eyes were significantly more prone to impaired or delayed wound healing and to the development of corneal haze.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ofloxacin Monotherapy for the Primary Treatment of Microbial KeratitisOphthalmology, 1997
- Effect of topical fluoroquinolones on corneal re-epithelialization after excimer laser keratectomyJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1997
- Corneal tissue levels of topically applied ofloxacinJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1997
- Penetration of Topically Applied Ciprofloxacin, Norfloxacin and Ofloxacin into the Aqueous Humor of the Uninflamed Human EyeJournal of Chemotherapy, 1997
- Efficacy of Ofloxacin vs Cefazolin and Tobramycin in the Therapy for Bacterial KeratitisArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1995
- Topical 0.3% ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin in treatment of bacterial keratitis: a new method for comparative evaluation of ocular drug penetration.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995
- Healing velocity of corneal epithelium evaluated by computerActa Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 1995
- Aqueous Humor Penetration of Ofloxacin Given by Various RoutesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1994
- Effects of antimicrobials on corneal epithelial migrationCurrent Eye Research, 1993
- Topical Ofloxacin in the Treatment of Pseudomonas Keratitis in a Rabbit ModeCornea, 1992