Conglomeration Versus Strategic Focus: Evidence from the Insurance Industry
Preprint
- 1 January 2000
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We provide evidence on the validity of the conglomeration hypothesis versus the strategic focus hypothesis for financial institutions using data on U.S. insurance companies. We distinguish between the hypotheses using profit scope economies, which measures the relative efficiency of joint versus specialized production, taking both costs and revenues into account. The results suggest that the conglomeration hypothesis dominates for some types of financial service providers and the strategic focus hypothesis dominates for other types. This may explain the empirical puzzle of why joint producers and specialists both appear to be competitively viable in the long run.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consolidation and efficiency in the US life insurance industryJournal of Banking & Finance, 1999
- Do consumers pay for one-stop banking? Evidence from an alternative revenue functionPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- The Efficiency Cost of Market Power in the Banking Industry: A Test of the “Quiet Life” and Related HypothesesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- The Coexistence of Multiple Distribution Systems for Financial Services: The Case of Property‐Liability InsuranceThe Journal of Business, 1997
- Diversification's effect on firm valueJournal of Financial Economics, 1995
- Corporate focus and stock returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 1995
- Bank efficiency derived from the profit functionJournal of Banking & Finance, 1993
- The dominance of inefficiencies over scale and product mix economies in bankingJournal of Monetary Economics, 1991
- Competitive viability in bankingJournal of Monetary Economics, 1987
- Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate MergersThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1981