Adaptive Parties in Spatial Elections
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 86 (4) , 929-937
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1964345
Abstract
We develop a model of two-party spatial elections that departs from the standard model in three respects: parties' information about voters' preferences is limited to polls; parties can be either office-seeking or ideological; and parties are not perfect optimizers, that is, they are modelled as boundedly rational adaptive actors. We employ computer search algorithms to model the adaptive behavior of parties and show that three distinct search algorithms lead to similar results. Our findings suggest that convergence in spatial voting models is robust to variations in the intelligence of parties. We also find that an adaptive party in a complex issue space may not be able to defeat a well-positioned incumbent.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Parties and Electoral LandscapesBritish Journal of Political Science, 1998
- Perspectives on Positive Political EconomySouthern Economic Journal, 1992
- MAJORITY RULE AND ELECTION MODELSJournal of Economic Surveys, 1990
- U.S. Constitutional Amendments, the Ratification Process, and Public Opinion: A Computer SimulationSimulation & Gaming, 1990
- Money as a medium of exchange in an economy with artificially intelligent agentsJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1990
- Simulation Games and the Development of Social TheorySimulation & Games, 1989
- Conflict and Complexity: Goal Diversity and Organizational Search EffectivenessAmerican Political Science Review, 1984
- A dynamical model of political equilibriumJournal of Economic Theory, 1977
- Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda controlJournal of Economic Theory, 1976
- An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral ProcessAmerican Political Science Review, 1970