Clinical Evaluation of a Prototype Motion Artifact Resistant Pulse Oximeter in the Recovery Room
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 83 (2) , 269-272
- https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199608000-00012
Abstract
The frequency and nature of spurious pulse oximetry readings were compared using both a conventional pulse oximeter (CPO) and a prototype Masimo signal extraction technology pulse oximeter (Masimo SET Trademark).At a university hospital, 50 ASA physical status I-IV adult patients who underwent general or spinalepidural anesthesia were selected from a group of 250 patients on the basis of high-alarm generation with routine postoperative pulse oximetry. Pulse oximetry data were recorded simultaneously from both devices with a computer. Overall, the CPO alarm frequency (i.e., oxygen saturation (Anesth Analg 1996;83:269-72)Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- DOES A PROTECTIVE SHEATH ALLOWING CLINICAL REUSE ALTER SENSITIVITY AND RESPONSE TIME OF DISPOSABLE PULSE OXIMETER PROBES?Anesthesiology, 1994
- Postanesthesia monitoring revisited: Frequency of true and false alarms from different monitoring devicesJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1994
- Recent Developments in Pulse OximetryAnesthesiology, 1992
- EFFECTS OF DEFAULT ALARM LIMITSETTINGS ON ALARM DISTRIBUTION IN TELEMETRIC PULSE OXIMETRY NETWORK IN WARD SETTINGAnesthesiology, 1991
- Pulse Oximeter Failure Thresholds in Hypotension and VasoconstrictionAnesthesiology, 1990
- Pulse OximetryAnesthesiology, 1989
- Blood Flow Limits and Pulse Oximeter Signal DetectionAnesthesiology, 1987
- Standards for patient monitoring during anesthesia at Harvard Medical SchoolPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1986