Hemodynamic–Morphologic Discriminants for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 42 (1) , 144-152
- https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.592923
Abstract
Background and Purpose—: The purpose of this study was to identify significant morphological and hemodynamic parameters that discriminate intracranial aneurysm rupture status using 3-dimensional angiography and computational fluid dynamics. Methods—: One hundred nineteen intracranial aneurysms (38 ruptured, 81 unruptured) were analyzed from 3-dimensional angiographic images and computational fluid dynamics. Six morphological and 7 hemodynamic parameters were evaluated for significance with respect to rupture. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified area under the curve (AUC) and optimal thresholds separating ruptured from unruptured aneurysms for each parameter. Significant parameters were examined by multivariate logistic regression analysis in 3 predictive models—morphology only, hemodynamics only, and combined—to identify independent discriminants, and the AUC receiver operating characteristic of the predicted probability of rupture status was compared among these models. Results—: Morphological parameters (size ratio, undulation index, ellipticity index, and nonsphericity index) and hemodynamic parameters (average wall shear stress [WSS], maximum intra-aneurysmal WSS, low WSS area, average oscillatory shear index, number of vortices, and relative resident time) achieved statistical significance ( P <0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated size ratio to be the only independently significant factor in the morphology model (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.91), whereas WSS and oscillatory shear index were the only independently significant variables in the hemodynamics model (AUC, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.93). The combined model retained all 3 variables, size ratio, WSS, and oscillatory shear index (AUC, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.96). Conclusion—: All 3 models—morphological (based on size ratio), hemodynamic (based on WSS and oscillatory shear index), and combined—discriminate intracranial aneurysm rupture status with high AUC values. Hemodynamics is as important as morphology in discriminating aneurysm rupture status.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Wall Shear Stress on Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms at the Internal Carotid ArteryAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2008
- Magnitude and Role of Wall Shear Stress on Cerebral AneurysmStroke, 2004
- Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics studyJournal of Neurosurgery, 2004
- Spatial comparison between wall shear stress measures and porcine arterial endothelial permeabilityAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2004
- Coexisting proinflammatory and antioxidative endothelial transcription profiles in a disturbed flow region of the adult porcine aortaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
- Analysis of the effect of disturbed flow on monocytic adhesion to endothelial cellsJournal of Biomechanics, 2003
- Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling in Realistic Arterial GeometriesAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2002
- A Review of Size and Location of Ruptured Intracranial AneurysmsNeurosurgery, 2001
- Hemodynamic Shear Stress and Its Role in AtherosclerosisJAMA, 1999
- Optimality principle in vascular bifurcationBiorheology, 1987