Exploring health preferences in sociodemographic and health related groups through the paired comparison of the items of the Nottingham Health Profile
Open Access
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- theory and-methods
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 54 (7) , 537-543
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.7.537
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preference weighted measures of health related quality of life are necessary for cost effectiveness calculations involving quality of life adjustment. There are conflicting data about the influence of factors such as sociodemographic and health related variables on health preferences. STUDY OBJECTIVE The relative values attached to the items of the Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) were assessed to make comparisons across social and health subgroups. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS Preference values were obtained in sets of 250 to 253 persons (total n=1258) using the method of paired comparisons after all possible pairs of NHP items had been presented to respondents for judgement of severity. χ2 Tests and Spearman's correlations among item ranks were calculated. MAIN RESULTS Findings show that preferences elicited with the method of paired comparisons are consistent and independent of the sample from which they are obtained (mean correlation coefficients across subgroups range from 0.87 to 0.96). Conclusion—The evaluation of health did not seem to be related to sociodemographic variables (gender, age, social class) or to the health status of the respondents, suggesting that health preferences are stable across different populations.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cross-cultural adaptation of health measuresPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The Nottingham health profile: Subjective health status and medical consultationsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Influence of socio-demographic and health status variables on evaluation of health states in a Spanish populationEuropean Journal of Public Health, 1995
- Lay people's evaluations of health: are there variations between different subgroups?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
- QALYs for resource allocation: probably not and certainly not nowAustralian Journal of Public Health, 1993
- Test-Retest Reliabilities of Two Treatment-preference Instruments in Measuring UtilitiesMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Laypersons' evaluation of health: an exploratory study of an Australian population.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990
- Cross-cultural variation in the weighting of health statements: A comparison of English and Swedish valuationsHealth Policy, 1987
- A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1980
- The utility of different health states as perceived by the general publicJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1978