Digit preference, recall bias, and nonresponse bias in self reports of angling participation
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leisure Sciences
- Vol. 15 (3) , 231-238
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409309513202
Abstract
Explored in this study is the role of digit preference as a response style that helps explain the problems of recall and nonresponse bias in self‐report surveys of recreation participation. Digit preference is a tendency to guess participation by rounding estimates to values that end in zero or five. Recall bias was assessed by comparing three separate recall periods: extended, intermediate, and short. Nonresponse bias was assessed by conducting telephone interviews with subjects who had not responded to the initial requests. The dependent variable was the total number of days fished per month from April to June 1989. Analysis of variance and chi‐Square were used to explore the relationships among the three sources of bias. A significant Recall × Nonresponse × Digit Preference interaction was found. Results suggest that bias traditionally attributable to recall and nonresponse may be a function of digit preference. Ways of controlling for the effects of the three sources of bias on recreation participation estimates are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reports of elapsed time: Bounding and rounding processes in estimation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990
- Response to mail surveys on resource‐based recreation topics: A behavioral model and an empirical analysisLeisure Sciences, 1989
- Research note—engagement as a criterion for defining homogeneous groups: Implications for mailed surveysLeisure Sciences, 1987
- Self-reported participation rates: further commentLeisure Studies, 1987
- Non‐respondents in homogeneous groups: Implications for mailed surveys—a commentLeisure Sciences, 1984
- Research noteLeisure Studies, 1983
- Nonrespondents in homogeneous groups: Implications for mailed surveysLeisure Sciences, 1983
- Nonsampling vs. Sampling Errors in Survey ResearchJournal of Marketing, 1982
- Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published LiteratureAmerican Sociological Review, 1978
- Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature ReviewJournal of Marketing Research, 1975