The Effects of Various Combinations of Chemical and Physical Treatments on the Physical Properties of Cotton Yarns and Bundles
- 1 July 1967
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Textile Research Journal
- Vol. 37 (7) , 574-581
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004051756703700704
Abstract
The effects of tension during resin treatment on the physical properties of yarns and fibers that had received various combinations of pretreatments were investigated for Pima, Bobshaw, and Deltapine cottons. Pretreatments included scouring, mercerization, and acid degradation. Dimethylolethyleneurea (DMEU) resin was applied at 2 and 5% add-on. Relationships between bundle and yarn tensile properties were studied and found to have high correlation. Some evidence was found that degradation prior to tension during resin curing has the effect of preventing strength losses due to cross linking. Degradation was observed to inhibit relative elongation losses in yarns due to tension curing. Degradation caused lower values of toughness whereas mercerization prevented such losses.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influences of Fiber Properties on Yarn TwistsTextile Research Journal, 1964
- The Effect of Tension on the Properties of Resin-Treated Cotton FabricsTextile Research Journal, 1962
- Response of Cottons to Chemical TreatmentsTextile Research Journal, 1962
- Response of Cottons to Chemical TreatmentsTextile Research Journal, 1962
- Effects of Tension During Resin Treatment on Physical Properties of Cotton Fibers and Yarns1Textile Research Journal, 1961
- Response of Cottons to Chemical TreatmentsTextile Research Journal, 1961
- Response of Cottons to Chemical TreatmentsTextile Research Journal, 1961
- Response of Cottons to Chemical Treatments Part I: Fiber Mercerization and Urea Treatments 1Textile Research Journal, 1961
- The Relation of Single-Fiber to Flat-Bundle Strength and Elongation of CottonTextile Research Journal, 1955
- Correlation of Yarn Strength with Fiber Strength Measured at Different Gage LengthsTextile Research Journal, 1954