Preliminary experience with a high bolus dose of tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 19 (1) , 28-33
- https://doi.org/10.1185/030079902125001380
Abstract
In the TARGET study, sub-optimal platelet inhibition with tirofiban was held responsible for the higher incidence of periprocedural CK-MB release compared to abciximab. Since then, a new, higher bolus dose of tirofiban has been proposed to increase blood concentrations very soon after the start of treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the bleeding risk and clinical outcome at 30 days in a series of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the new dosing regimen of tirofiban (25 microg/kg bolus followed by a 0.15 microg kg(-1) min(-1) infusion for 18 h). A total of 133 consecutive patients underwent a PCI and received a high bolus dose of tirofiban. Platelet function inhibition was measured using the Ultegra RPFA (Accumetrics) 10 min and 8 and 24 h after the start of therapy in the first 38 cases. The procedural success rate was 98.5%. The mean level of platelet inhibition 10 min after the start of therapy was 94.7 +/- 5.9%. No major bleedings, no need for red blood cell transfusion and no episodes of severe thrombocytopoenia were recorded. Groin haematoma was observed in seven patients (5.3%). The cumulative incidence of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events was 4.6% (five myocardial infarctions and one repeat PTCA for sub-acute stent thrombosis). The use of a high bolus dose of tirofiban in patients undergoing PCI seems to be safe and not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. This high bolus dose may help to further reduce the rate of periprocedural adverse events.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of degree of platelet inhibition by abciximab versus tirofiban in patients with unstable angina pectoris and non–Q-wave myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary interventionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2002
- The Ultegra rapid platelet-function assay: comparison to standard platelet function assays in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with abciximab therapy.American Heart Journal, 2002
- Suboptimal early inhibition of platelets by treatment with tirofiban and implications for coronary interventionsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2002
- Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devicesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Comparison of Two Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors, Tirofiban and Abciximab, for the Prevention of Ischemic Events with Percutaneous Coronary RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- A deterministic approach to automated stenosis quantificationCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 1999
- Tirofiban (Aggrastat®)Cardiovascular Drug Reviews, 1999
- Which Variable of Stenosis Severity Best Describes the Significance of an Isolated Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Lesion?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Rapid and Simple Platelet Function Assay to Assess Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor BlockadeCirculation, 1997
- Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty).Circulation, 1988