Echocardiographic interpretation of pericardial effusion
- 1 April 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 138 (4) , 622-625
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.138.4.622
Abstract
Echocardiography has proved to be quite useful in the detection of pericardial effusion in humans. As little as 15 ml of fluid within the pericardial space can be detected. Specific signs of pericardial effusion, such as electrical alternans and paradoxical pulse, have become better understood by echocardiographic study. The detection of pericardial effusion still may be quite difficult if careful attention is not given to technique. False-positive diagnosis of anterior pericardial effusion can be seen with epicardial fat pad, pericardial cyst, or foramen or Morgagni hernia. False-positive posterior pericardial effusion can be seen in large left pleural effusion, calcified mitral anulus or excessively medial transducer angulation. New switched-gain circuits have helped detection of pericardial effusion by enhancement of pericardial echoes.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abnormal Septal Motion in Cardiac Tamponade with Pulsus ParadoxusChest, 1977
- Pericardial Tumor or Fibrosis Mimicking Pericardial Effusion by EchocardiographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1977
- False-Positive Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Pericardial EffusionChest, 1977
- Cardiac Motion in Patients with Pericardial EffusionCirculation, 1966