Heart Failure Care in the Outpatient Cardiology Practice Setting
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Heart Failure
- Vol. 1 (2) , 98-106
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.108.772228
Abstract
Background— Few data exist regarding contemporary care patterns for heart failure (HF) in the outpatient setting. IMPROVE HF is a prospective cohort study designed to characterize current management of patients with chronic HF and ejection fraction ≤35% in a national registry of 167 US outpatient cardiology practices. Methods and Results— Baseline patient characteristics and data on care of 15381 patients with diagnosed HF or prior myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction were collected by chart abstraction. To quantify use of therapies, 7 individual metrics (use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker, aldosterone antagonist, anticoagulation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and HF education) and composite metrics were assessed. Care metrics include only patients documented to be eligible and without contraindications or intolerance. Among practices, 69% were nonteaching. Patients were 71% male, with a median age of 70 years, and a median ejection fraction of 25%. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (80%) and β-blocker (86%) was relatively high in eligible patients in the outpatient cardiology setting; other metrics, such as aldosterone antagonist (36%), device therapy (implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator, 51%; cardiac resynchronization therapy, 39%), and education (61%), showed lower rates of use. A median 27% of patients received all HF therapies for which they were potentially eligible on the basis of chart documentation. Use of guideline-recommended therapies by practices varied widely. Conclusions— These data are among the first to assess treatment in the outpatient setting since the release of the latest national HF guidelines and to demonstrate substantial variation among cardiology practices in the documented therapies provided to HF patients.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2007 UpdateCirculation, 2007
- Changing Incidence and Survival for Heart Failure in a Well-Defined Older Population, 1970–1974 and 1990–1994Circulation, 2006
- The Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte and the Abdominal Aortic AneurysmCirculation, 2005
- The Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Amiodarone or an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator for Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Long-Term Healthcare and Cost Outcomes of Disease Management in a Large, Randomized, Community-Based Population With Heart FailureCirculation, 2004
- Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Combined Cardiac Resynchronization and Implantable Cardioversion Defibrillation in Advanced Chronic Heart FailureJAMA, 2003
- Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection FractionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002