Why realists disagree about the Third World (and why they shouldn't)
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Security Studies
- Vol. 5 (3) , 358-381
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419608429283
Abstract
(1996). Why realists disagree about the Third World (and why they shouldn't) Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 358-381.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Realism and Domestic Politics: A Review EssayInternational Security, 1992
- Why Europe matters, why the third world doesn't: American grand strategy after the cold warJournal of Strategic Studies, 1990
- The Case for Finite Containment: Analyzing U.S. Grand StrategyInternational Security, 1989
- Redefining SecurityForeign Affairs, 1989
- Containment on the Perimeter: George F. Kennan and VietnamDiplomatic History, 1988
- The Contributions of President Kenneth N. WaltzPs, 1987
- Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in EuropeInternational Security, 1984
- Defense Policy and the Reagan Administration: Departure from ContainmentInternational Security, 1983
- Why Coaling Stations are Necessary in the Nuclear AgeInternational Security, 1977
- Another “Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United StatesAmerican Political Science Review, 1952