A critique of several conceptions of practice theory in nursing
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Research in Nursing & Health
- Vol. 3 (2) , 69-79
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770030205
Abstract
The thesis of this article is that the Dickoff, James, and Wiedenbach (1968a, 1968b) conception of a practice theory is roughly equivalent to a plan of action. This idea is contrasted with other conceptions of a prescriptive practice theory, especially the set‐of‐rules conception described by Jacox (1974). The set‐of‐rules conception is shown to be untenable, and other conceptions of practice theory are shown to be nothing more than examples of established forms of knowledge.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Science, Values, and Human JudgmentScience, 1976
- THEORY CONSTRUCTION IN NURSINGNursing Research, 1974
- A PRACTICE THEORY OF NURSING CARENursing Research, 1972
- TOWARD A CLEARER UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCEPT OF NURSING THEORYNursing Research, 1971
- BELIEFS AND VALUES: BASES FOR CURRICULUM DESIGNNursing Research, 1970
- THEORY IN A PRACTICE DISCIPLINENursing Research, 1968
- THEORY IN A PRACTICE DISCIPLINENursing Research, 1968
- A THEORY OF THEORIESNursing Research, 1968