Pharmacologic therapies for adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
- 18 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2004 (4) , CD004477
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004477.pub2
Abstract
Multiple pharmacologic treatments have been studied for acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Our objective was to determine the effects of pharmacologic treatments on clinical outcomes in adults with ALI or ARDS. We searched OVID versions of CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to week 2, January 2004), EMBASE (1980 to week 4, 2004), CINAHL (1982 to week 2, January 2004), and HEALTHSTAR (1995 to December 2003); proceedings from four conferences (1994 to 2003); and bibliographies of review articles and included studies. Randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatments compared to no therapy or placebo for established ALI or ARDS in adults admitted to an intensive care unit, with measurement of early mortality (primary outcome), late mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days to day 28, or adverse events. We excluded trials of nitric oxide, partial liquid ventilation, fluid and nutritional interventions, oxygen, and trials in other populations reporting outcomes in subgroups of patients with ALI or ARDS. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, rated studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed methodologic quality of included studies. Disagreements were resolved by consensus in consultation with a third reviewer. For each pharmacologic therapy, we quantitatively pooled the results of studies using random effects models where permitted by the available data. We contacted study authors when clarification of the primary outcome was required. Thirty three trials randomizing 3272 patients met our inclusion criteria. Pooling of results showed no effect on early mortality of prostaglandin E1 (seven trials randomizing 697 patients; relative risk [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 1.17), N-acetylcysteine (five trials randomizing 239 patients; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.21), early high-dose corticosteroids (two trials randomizing 187 patients; RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.74), or surfactant (nine trials randomizing 1441 patients; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.12). Two interventions were beneficial in single small trials; corticosteroids given for late phase ARDS reduced hospital mortality (24 patients; RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.81), and pentoxifylline reduced one-month mortality (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95) in 30 patients with metastatic cancer and ARDS. Individual trials of nine additional interventions failed to show a beneficial effect on prespecified outcomes. Effective pharmacotherapy for ALI and ARDS is extremely limited, with insufficient evidence to support any specific intervention.Keywords
This publication has 102 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Trial Design and Outcomes in Patients with Severe SepsisShock, 2003
- Epidemiology of acute lung injuryCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lisofylline for early treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeDrugs, 2001
- Report of the American-European consensus conference on ARDS: Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes and clinical trial coordinationIntensive Care Medicine, 1994
- Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysisStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- High-Dose Corticosteroids in Patients with the Adult Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- The Effects of High-Dose Corticosteroids in Patients with Septic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984