Artificial Tutoring Systems: What Computers Can and Can't Know
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Educational Computing Research
- Vol. 16 (2) , 107-124
- https://doi.org/10.2190/4cwm-6jf2-t2dn-qg8l
Abstract
After more than four decades, development of artificially intelligent tutoring systems has been constrained by two interrelated problems: knowledge representation and natural language understanding. G. S. Maccia's epistemology of intelligent natural systems implies that computer systems will need to develop qualitative intelligence before these problems can be solved. Recent research on how human nervous systems develop provides evidence for the significance of qualitative intelligence. Qualitative intelligence is required for understanding of culturally bound meanings of signs used in communication among intelligent natural systems. S. I. Greenspan provides neurological and clinical evidence that emotion and sensation are vital to the growth of mind—capabilities that computer systems do not currently possess. Therefore, we must view computers in education as media through which a multitude of teachers can convey their messages. This does not mean that the role of classroom teachers is diminished. Teachers and students can be empowered by these additional learning resources.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morphogenesis in memory formation: synaptic and cellular mechanismsBehavioural Brain Research, 1995
- Computerized Adaptive Mastery Tests as Expert SystemsJournal of Educational Computing Research, 1992
- Sensory Deprivation Stress and Supplemental Stimulation in the Rat Pup and Preterm Human NeonateChild Development, 1987
- Correspondence: Genetic epistemology of intelligent natural systemsSystems Research, 1987
- The AI BusinessPublished by MIT Press ,1984