Comprehending referential expressions during reading: Evidence from eye tracking
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 24 (2) , 229-252
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545014
Abstract
Two eye‐tracking experiments investigated how referential expressions, consisting of proper names and pronouns, influence reading comprehension. Experiment 1 showed that repeated names caused elevated reading times compared to pronouns, a finding that has been called the repeated‐name penalty in studies using self‐paced reading (Gordon, Grosz, & Gilliom, 1993). Consistent with these previous studies, Experiment 1 also showed that the repeated‐name penalty occurs for syntactic subjects that corefer with the subject of the preceding sentence, but does not occur for direct objects that corefer with an object of the preceding sentence. These results further serve to localize the repeated‐name penalty within the sentence and to show that it can be associated with an increase in the frequency of regressive saccades out of the text region beyond the repeated name. Experiment 2 showed that the repeated‐name penalty was modulated not only by syntactic factors within a sentence but also by the relationship between successive sentences in a discourse. The results of these experiments provide strong support for the centering theory of discourse and related approaches to the processing of referential and coreferential expressions.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reading the WordsHer, His, Him:Implications for Parsing Principles Based on Frequency and on StructureJournal of Memory and Language, 1997
- Centering attention in discourseLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 1995
- Pronouns, Passives, and Discourse CoherenceJournal of Memory and Language, 1995
- Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in DiscourseCognitive Science, 1993
- Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisionsJournal of Memory and Language, 1991
- Mechanisms that improve referential accessCognition, 1989
- Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processingJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1983
- Understanding anaphora: Rules used by readers in assigning pronominal referents∗Discourse Processes, 1981
- Recent studies in the correlation of eye movement and visual perception.Psychological Bulletin, 1906
- Visual perception during eye movement.Psychological Review, 1900