Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification
Top Cited Papers
- 17 May 2004
- proceedings article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Abstract
Dichotomies between privacy attitudes and behavior have been noted in the literature but not yet fully explained. We apply lessons from the research on behavioral economics to understand the individual decision making process with respect to privacy in electronic commerce. We show that it is unrealistic to expectindividual rationality in this context. Models of self-control problems and immediate gratification offer more realistic descriptions of the decision process and are more consistent with currently available data. In particular, we show why individuals who may genuinely want to protect their privacy might not do so because of psychological distortions well documented in the behavioral literature; we show that these distortions may affect not only 'naive' individuals but also 'sophisticated' ones; and we prove that this may occur also when individuals perceive the risks from not protecting their privacy as significant.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Choice and ProcrastinationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001
- What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents' perceptions of short-term and long-term consequences of smokingJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000
- Optimistic Biases About Personal RisksScience, 1989
- A Theory of Rational AddictionJournal of Political Economy, 1988
- Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonymsCommunications of the ACM, 1981
- An Introduction to Privacy in Economics and PoliticsThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1980
- The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market MechanismThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970
- Professed attitudes and actual behavior.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1937
- Attitudes vs. ActionsSocial Forces, 1934
- The Right to PrivacyHarvard Law Review, 1890