A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery
Open Access
- 22 July 1993
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 329 (4) , 228-233
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199307223290402
Abstract
Restenosis is a major limitation of coronary angioplasty. Directional coronary atherectomy was developed with the expectation that it would provide better results than angioplasty, including a lower rate of restenosis. We undertook a randomized, multicenter trial to compare the rates of restenosis for atherectomy and angioplasty when used to treat lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Of 274 patients referred for first-time, nonsurgical revascularization of lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, 138 were randomly assigned to undergo atherectomy and 136 to undergo angioplasty; 257 of 265 eligible patients (97 percent) underwent follow-up angiography at a median of 5.9 months. Computer-assisted quantitative measurements of luminal dimensions were determined from the angiograms obtained before and immediately after the procedure and at follow-up. The primary end point of restenosis was defined as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the vessel's diameter at follow-up. Quantitative analysis showed that the procedural success rate was higher in patients who underwent atherectomy than in those who had angioplasty (94 percent vs. 88 percent, P = 0.061); there was no significant difference in the frequency of major in-hospital complications (5 percent vs. 6 percent). At follow-up, the rate of restenosis was 46 percent after atherectomy and 43 percent after angioplasty (P = 0.71). Despite a larger initial gain in the minimal luminal diameter with atherectomy (mean [±SD], 1.45 ±0.47 vs. 1.16 ±0.44 mm; P<0.001), there was a larger late loss (0.79 ±0.61 vs. 0.47 ±0.64 mm, P<0.001), resulting in a similar minimal luminal diameter in the two groups at follow-up (1.55 ±0.60 vs. 1.61 ±0.68, P = 0.44). The clinical outcomes at six months were not significantly different between the two groups. the role of atherectomy in percutaneous coronary revascularization remains to be fully defined. However, as compared with angioplasty, atherectomy did not result in better late angiographic or clinical outcomes in patients with lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. (n Engl J Med 1993;329:228-33.).Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Abrupt vessel closure after directional coronary atherectomyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty follows a near gaussian distribution: A quantitative angiographic study in 1,445 successfully dilated lesionsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Clinical trials of restenosis after coronary angioplasty.Circulation, 1991
- Clinical, physiologic, anatomic and procedural factors predictive of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Relation of stenosis morphology and clinical presentation to the procedural results of directional coronary atherectomy.Circulation, 1991
- Quantitative angiography after directional coronary atherectomy.Heart, 1991
- Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: New standards for clinical studiesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Restenosis After Successful Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty: Serial Angiographic Follow-Up of 229 PatientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988