Does Aggressive Care Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Reduce Mortality? Analysis with Instrumental Variables to Compare Effectiveness in Canadian and United States Patient Populations
- 18 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Services Research
- Vol. 38 (6p1) , 1423-1440
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00186.x
Abstract
Previous U.S. studies suggest that the incremental ("marginal") use of the aggressive approach to care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients differing only in their distance to hospitals offering aggressive care may be associated with small mortality benefits. We hypothesized that the marginal benefits should be larger in Canada, as the country is operating on a lower margin because the approach to care is more conservative overall. This retrospective study used administrative data of hospital admissions and health services for all patients admitted for a first AMI in Quebec in 1988 (n = 8,674). We used differential distances to hospitals offering aggressive care as instrumental variables when measuring mortality up to four years after AMI. Of the 4,422 subjects who were > or = 65 years old, 11 percent received cardiac catheterization within 90 days after admission. In a previous study that applied similar methodology to the 1987 U.S. Medicare population, 23 percent of subjects received catheterization within 90 days. As in the U.S. study, we found that subjects living closer to hospitals offering aggressive care were more likely to receive aggressive care than subjects living further away (26 percent versus 19 percent received cardiac catheterization within 90 days; 95 percent CI: 5 percent to 9 percent). Unlike the U.S. study, we found no differences in mortality across the "close" versus "far" differential distance groups (unadjusted differences at one year: 1 percent; 95 percent CI: -1 percent to 3 percent). This absence of association held in elderly (> or = 65 years) and younger age groups. Adjusted results also showed no differences between subjects receiving aggressive versus conservative care (at one year: 4 percent; 95 percent CI: -11 percent to 20 percent). Contrary to our hypothesis, but consistent with results from numerous randomized trials and observational studies, we cannot confirm that, on the margin, the aggressive approach to post-AMI care is associated with mortality benefits in Canada.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac Procedure Use and Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States and Quebec, Canada, 1988 to 1994Medical Care, 2003
- ECONOMETRICS IN OUTCOMES RESEARCH: The Use of Instrumental VariablesAnnual Review of Public Health, 1998
- ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Correlation of Travel Time on Roads versus Straight Line DistanceMedical Care Research and Review, 1995
- Better functional status in American than Canadian patients with heart disease: An effect of medical care?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Differences in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction Between the United States and CanadaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1995
- Problems with using observational databases to compare treatmentsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Randomized controlled trial of late in-hospital angiography and angioplasty versus conservative management after treatment with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Comparison of Invasive and Conservative Strategies after Treatment with Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- THROMBOLYSIS WITH TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: NO ADDITIONAL BENEFIT FROM IMMEDIATE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY ANGIOPLASTYThe Lancet, 1988