Comparison of continuous and discrete representations of unobserved heterogeneity in logit models
- 1 March 2014
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Marketing Analytics
- Vol. 2 (1) , 43-58
- https://doi.org/10.1057/jma.2014.5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Bayes Factor Approximation Methods Including Two New MethodsSociological Methods & Research, 2012
- Multimodel InferenceSociological Methods & Research, 2004
- An Empirical Comparison of Logit Choice Models with Discrete versus Continuous Representations of HeterogeneityJournal of Marketing Research, 2002
- Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit modelTransportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2001
- An Endogenous Segmentation Mode Choice Model with an Application to Intercity TravelTransportation Science, 1997
- Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel DataJournal of Marketing Research, 1991
- Removing Heterogeneity Bias from Logit Model EstimationMarketing Science, 1988
- A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration DataEconometrica, 1984
- A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner DataMarketing Science, 1983
- Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative DataThe Review of Economic Studies, 1980