Inventories, Lumpy Trade, and Large Devaluations
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 100 (5) , 2304-2339
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2304
Abstract
We document that delivery lags and transaction-level economics of scale matter for international trade, leading importers to import infrequently and hold additional inventory. In a model with these frictions calibrated to empirical measures of inventory and trade lumpiness, these frictions have a large (20 percent) tariff equivalent, mostly due to inventory carrying costs. These frictions also alter the dynamics of imports and prices. Consistent with evidence from large devaluation episodes in six developing economies, following terms-of-trade and interest rate shocks, the model generates a short-term implosion of imports and a gradual increase in the retail price of imports. (JEL D92, F14, G31, L81, M11)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Great Trade Collapse of 2008–09: An Inventory Adjustment?IMF Economic Review, 2010
- Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International TradeAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- Inventories and the Business Cycle: An Equilibrium Analysis of (S, s) PoliciesAmerican Economic Review, 2007
- EXPLAINING INVENTORIES: A BUSINESS CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF THE STOCKOUT AVOIDANCE AND (S,s) MOTIVESMacroeconomic Dynamics, 2007
- Do Sunk Costs of Exporting Matter for Net Export Dynamics?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007
- International Trade and Macroeconomic Dynamics with Heterogeneous Firms*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005
- Distance, Time, and Specialization: Lean Retailing in General EquilibriumAmerican Economic Review, 2005
- Trade CostsJournal of Economic Literature, 2004
- An empirical model of inventory investment by durable commodity intermediariesCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 2000
- The Terms of Trade, the Real Exchange Rate, and Economic FluctuationsInternational Economic Review, 1995