THE CAUSES OF PATIENT DROPOUT FROM PENILE SELF-INJECTION THERAPY FOR IMPOTENCE
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 162 (4) , 1291-1294
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68269-9
Abstract
Penile self-injection therapy, a second line treatment for erectile dysfunction, is the most efficacious means of reestablishing functional erections when first line therapies fail and the patient wants to avoid penile prosthesis implantation. Despite high efficacy rates, injection therapy has high dropout rates. To our knowledge studies to date analyzing patient attrition have reviewed small numbers of patients followed for only short periods. We elucidate the main reasons for patient dropout in a large penile self-injection program with long-term followup. A questionnaire was mailed to 1,424 patients who completed the office training and home use phases of a penile self-injection program. The overall attrition rate was 31% of the 720 men who completed the questionnaire, with a mean followup of 38 months. The main reasons for dropout were cost of therapy, patient and partner problems with the concept of penile injection, lack of partner availability and spontaneous improvement in erections. Lack of efficacy of therapy was the primary reason for only 1 of 7 dropouts. Furthermore, adverse effects of penile injections (priapism, penile nodules, pain) appeared to be only minor contributors to dropout. To our knowledge this study is the largest published, single center cohort of patients treated with injection and followed for an analysis of dropout rates. Based on study data a reduction in dropout rates may be achieved by keeping the cost of therapy low, and ensuring patient and partner education as well as continued support throughout treatment.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral Sildenafil in the Treatment of Erectile DysfunctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Drop-out reasons and complications in self-injection therapy with a triple vasoactive drug mixture in sexual erectile dysfunctionInternational Journal Of Impotence Research, 1998
- Influence of the method of intracavernous injection on penile rigidity: A possible pharmacokinetic explanationUrology, 1997
- Alkalization Does Not Alleviate Penile Pain Induced By Intracavernous Injection of Prostaglandin E1Journal of Urology, 1996
- Slow injection of prostaglandin E1 decreases associated penile painUrology, 1996
- Pharmacological Management of Erectile DysfunctionDrugs, 1995
- High attrition rate with intracavernousinjection of prostaglandin E1 for impotencyUrology, 1994
- Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self-injection versus external vacuum devicesUrology, 1992
- Why do so many people drop out from auto-injection therapy for impotence?Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1989
- Intracavernosal pharmacotherapy: the pharmacologic erection programWorld Journal of Urology, 1987