Effect of finishing procedures on surface textures of some resin restoratives A comparison between new and old types of composite resins
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 38 (5) , 293-301
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358009033596
Abstract
Evaluations were made of the effect of different finishing procedures on the surface textures of a conventional composite material, two newly introduced microfiller composite resins, a visible light polymerized resin, and a glass ionomer cement. The two micro-filler composite materials appeared to be superior in finishability compared with those materials loaded with larger filler particles. The use of fine grit devices particularly resulted in smooth surfaces. This is in contrast to the other materials which always showed rough surface textures with protruding filler particles. The use of a polishing paste improved the surface finish of the microfiller materials in contrast to the materials with larger filler particles.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The finishing of composite restorationsBritish Dental Journal, 1978
- Clinical characteristics of a glass-ionomer cementBritish Dental Journal, 1978
- Microporous glassy fillers for dental compositesJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1978
- The clinical development of the glass‐ionomer cement. III. The erosion lesion*Australian Dental Journal, 1977
- Surface roughness of restorationsBritish Dental Journal, 1976
- Surface Roughness of Composite Filling MaterialsBiomaterials, Medical Devices, and Artificial Organs, 1975
- Comparison of methods used in finishing composite resin—A scanning electron microscope studyThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1974
- A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cementBritish Dental Journal, 1972
- Surface Roughness of Composite Resins Before and After FinishingActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1972
- The surface hardness of polymeric restorative materialsBritish Dental Journal, 1971