Twelve-Month Evaluation of Brimonidine-Purite Versus Brimonidine in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Glaucoma
- Vol. 11 (2) , 119-126
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200204000-00007
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of brimonidine-Purite (Alphagan; Allergan, Irvine, CA) 0.15% and 0.2% three times daily with brimonidine (Alphagan) 0.2% three times daily in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In this 12-month, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group study, patients were randomly assigned to receive brimonidine-Purite 0.15% (n = 381), brimonidine-Purite 0.2% (n = 383), or brimonidine 0.2% (n = 383) three times daily. Visits were conducted before the study, at baseline, at weeks 2 and 6, and at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Diurnal intraocular pressure was measured at 8 am, 10 am, 3 pm, and 5 pm at baseline, week 6, and at months 3, 6, and 12. Intraocular pressure was also measured at 8 and 10 am at week 2 and month 9. Safety was evaluated by adverse events and other ocular and systemic measures. At baseline, mean intraocular pressure was similar in the three treatment groups. During follow-up, there were no statistically significant among-group differences in mean intraocular pressure or mean changes from baseline intraocular pressure (at peak or trough). The difference in mean intraocular pressure between the brimonidine-Purite-0.15% and brimonidine-0.2% treatment group was less than 1 mm Hg at all time points. The relative percent difference in allergic conjunctivitis was 41% lower in the brimonidine-Purite 0.15% group compared with the brimonidine 0.2% group. The comfort and satisfaction rating significantly favored brimonidine-Purite 0.15%. Over 12-months, brimonidine-Purite 0.15% and 0.2% provided intraocular pressure lowering comparable with brimonidine 0.2% in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Brimonidine-Purite 0.15% showed the most favorable safety and tolerability profile with a reduced incidence of allergic conjunctivitis and better satisfaction and comfort rating.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of systemic β-blocker therapy on the efficacy and safety of topical brimonidine and timolol11None of the clinical investigators or authors have a proprietary interest in the products discussed in this manuscript; Pamela Barnett, Amy Batoosingh, Kuankuan Chen, Robert David, MD, Marsha Harrold, and Amanda VanDenburgh are employees of Allergan, Inc.Ophthalmology, 2000
- The evolving pharmacotherapeutic profile of brimonidine, an 2-adrenergic agonist, after four years of continuous useExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 2000
- The Effectiveness and Safety of Brimonidine as Mono-, Combination, or Replacement Therapy for Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Post Hoc Analysis of an Open-Label Community TrialJournal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2000
- Ongoing clinical assessment of the safety profile and efficacy of brimonidine compared with timolol: Year-three resultsClinical Therapeutics, 2000
- Efficacy of brimonidine as replacement therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensionClinical Therapeutics, 2000
- Brimonidine tartrate 0.2% twice daily vs timolol 0.5% twice daily: 1-year results in glaucoma patientsAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1999
- Twelve-month results of an ongoing randomized trial comparing brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and timolol 0.5% given twice daily in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertensionOphthalmology, 1998
- A 1-Year Study of Brimonidine Twice Daily in Glaucoma and Ocular HypertensionArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1997
- A comparison of the safety and efficacy of twice daily brimonidine 0.2% versus betaxolol 0.25% in subjects with elevated intraocular pressureSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1996
- Clinical experience with brimonidine 0.2% and timolol 0.5% in glaucoma and ocular hypertensionSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1996