THE QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC EDUCATION: A CASE‐STUDY OF URBAN INDIA†
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
- Vol. 58 (1) , 57-82
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1996.mp58001004.x
Abstract
Recent evidence of a substantial link between quality of schooling and individual productivity suggests that, from an economic efficiency perspective, quality aspects of education deserve attention. This paper presents empirical evidence on the relative quality and efficiency of private and government‐funded schools in urban India, using data from Uttar Pradesh. The results suggest that standardizing for home background and controlling for sample selectivity greatly reduces the raw average achievement advantage of private school students over public school students, but does not wipe it out. Private schools' standardized achievement advantage (or better quality) is complemented by their lower unit costs to enable them to be more efficient. The results support much of the existing international evidence on the relative efficiency of private and public schools.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does School Quality Matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Public Schools in the United StatesJournal of Political Economy, 1992
- THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIESThe World Bank Research Observer, 1991
- The relative effectiveness of private and public schools: Evidence from two developing countriesJournal of Development Economics, 1990
- The Relative Efficiency of Private and Public Schools: The Case of ThailandThe World Bank Economic Review, 1988
- Generalized Econometric Models with SelectivityEconometrica, 1983
- Cognitive Outcomes in Public and Private SchoolsSociology of Education, 1982
- Education and Self-SelectionJournal of Political Economy, 1979
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification ErrorEconometrica, 1979
- Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor MarketsInternational Economic Review, 1973