Development of an asthma specific job exposure matrix and its application in the epidemiological study of genetics and environment in asthma (EGEA)
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Vol. 57 (9) , 635-641
- https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.57.9.635
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a method suitable for estimating exposure risks in population studies of asthma from job titles and international codes, by combining a new job exposure matrix (JEM) with the expert judgement approach. The method was applied in the French epidemiological study of the genetics and environment in asthma (EGEA). METHODS The JEM contains 22 exposure groups including 18 high risk groups based on known risk factors for occupational asthma, divided into high molecular weight agents, low molecular weight agents, and mixed environments. After applying the JEM to job codes, exposure estimates for each subject were re-evaluated by examining job title texts. Three high risk exposure estimates for asthma were compared: firstly, applying the JEM to original codes (from different coders in each study centre); secondly, applying the JEM to revised codes (from one experienced coder); and thirdly, after reviewing JEM exposure estimates in the light of job title texts. RESULTS The study comprised 173 cases with asthma and 285 controls (age 18–65). Odds ratios (ORs) for asthma for high risk jobs were 1.0 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.6 to 1.7), applying the JEM to original codes; 1.4 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.3), applying the JEM to revised codes; and 1.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.7), applying the JEM and subsequently re-evaluating exposure estimates from job title texts. Asthma ORs were 1.4 (95% CI 0.6 to 2.9) for high molecular weight agents, 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.4) for low molecular weight agents, and 2.1 (95% CI 0.9 to 5.2) for mixed environments. CONCLUSIONS This asthma JEM, when enhanced by expert re-evaluation of exposure estimates from job title texts, may be a useful tool in general population studies of asthma. In this study, a 1.7-fold increase in prevalence odds of high risk exposures was found among asthmatic workers compared with controls, with risk magnitude varying for different classes of exposure.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of population specific job exposure matrices (JEMs): European collaborative analyses on occupational risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with job exposure matrices (ECOJEM)Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2000
- Occupational case‐control studies: I. Collecting information on work histories and work‐related exposuresAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1994
- An analysis of the reliability of self reported work histories from a cohort of workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1993
- Studying the Performance of a Job Exposure MatrixInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1993
- Personal Factors Related to the Perception of Occupational Exposure: An Application of a Job Exposure MatrixInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Magnitude of misclassification bias when using a job-exposure matrix.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1992
- Chronic Non-Specific Lung Disease and Occupational Exposures Estimated by Means of a Job Exposure Matrix: The Zutphen StudyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1989
- Death certificate‐based occupational mortality surveillance in the united statesAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1987
- A job-exposure matrix for use in population based studies in England and Wales.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1985
- Job Exposure Matrix MethodologyJournal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 1983