Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in Measurement of Non–Small-Cell Carcinoma Lung Lesions: Implications for Assessment of Tumor Response
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 21 (13) , 2574-2582
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.01.144
Abstract
Purpose: Response of solid malignancies to therapy is usually determined by serial measurements of tumor size. The purpose of our study was to assess the consistency of measurements performed by readers evaluating lung tumors.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiologic Measurement of Tumor Size in Clinical TrialsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Small Pulmonary Nodules: Volumetrically Determined Growth Rates Based on CT EvaluationRadiology, 2000
- Evaluation of Tumor Measurements in Oncology: Use of Film-Based and Electronic TechniquesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Is the chest radiograph a reliable tool in the assessment of tumor response after radiotherapy in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma?International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1998
- The Impact of 2D Versus 3D Quantitation of Tumor Bulk Determination on Current Methods of Assessing Response to TreatmentJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1996
- Chest Tumor Response Measurement during Lung Cancer Chemotherapy: Comparison between Computed Tomography and Standard RoentgenographyAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1992
- Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981
- Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumorsCancer, 1980