Improved Methods for Assessing Information Technology in Primary Health Care and an Example from Telemedicine
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Vol. 1 (3) , 157-164
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x9500100305
Abstract
A change in evaluation methodology, from a strictly technical approach to a more comprehensive one, would result in better and less biased decision making in connection with the introduction of information technology in health care. To reach this goal, guidelines are required for building and refining contextual frames, taking qualitative considerations into account. We used primary health care as an example. A literature search produced over 200 relevant articles, from which 76 were selected which explicitly referred to evaluation in connection with health-care information systems. Text analysis allowed us to classify them into three groups. This allowed the development of a contextual frame and emphasized the human dimension as a possible problem area when using medical information systems.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is primary care essential?Published by Elsevier ,1994
- Electronic communication between providers of primary and secondary care.BMJ, 1992
- Comparison of computer-aided and human review of general practitioners' management of hypertensionThe Lancet, 1991
- Evaluating medical expert systems: what to test and how?Medical Informatics, 1990
- Evaluating and validating very large knowledge-based systemsMedical Informatics, 1990
- The Rhetorical TurnPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1990
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988
- Scientific Discovery, Logic, and RationalityPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- How To Do Things With WordsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1975
- Speech ActsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1969