Bacteriology of Rattlesnake Venom and Implications for Therapy
- 1 December 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 140 (5) , 818-821
- https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/140.5.818
Abstract
Although the incidence of infection secondary to the bites of venomous snakes remains unknown, the routine use of prophylactic antimicrobial therapy is advocated. In this study, the venom from 15 rattlesnakes was cultured, and 58 aerobic and 28 anaerobic strains of bacteria were isolated. The most common species isolated were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus species, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Clostridium species. Bacteroides fragilis was also recovered. When the fang sheaths of four additional rattlesnakes were retracted and the fangs of these snakes decontaminated, 50% of the samples of venom had no bacterial growth (P = 0.035). Until a clinical study is performed, the use of antimicrobial therapy that reflects the complex oral flora of rattlesnakes is still recommended in most cases of envenomization.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bacteriology of human and animal bite woundsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1978
- Poisonous snakebite treatment in the United StatesJAMA, 1978
- Early debridement in pit viper bitesJAMA, 1976
- Antivenin and Antitoxin in the Treatment of Experimental Rattlesnake Venom Intoxication (Crotalus Adamanteus)The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1961