Ridesharing, Firm Size, and Urban Form
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Planning Education and Research
- Vol. 10 (2) , 131-142
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9101000210
Abstract
Ridesharing, firm size, and urban form are analyzed using 1980 Census data. It was hypothesized that the propensity of employees to carpool should increase with firm size at the regional level of analysis. A few outlier observations at the county and SMSA levels of analysis seemed to corroborate this hypothesis. In general, however, no relationship, or a weakly negative one, was found between firm size and the propensity of employees to carpool at the regional level. Firm size is therefore probably not a direct cause of higher levels of employee ridesharing. Other factors, including the interrelated location decisions of firms and their employees, must also be involved.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A review of the impact of parking policy measures on travel demandTransportation Planning and Technology, 1989
- What Happened to the CBD-Distance Gradient?: Land Values in a Policentric CityEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1989
- Research Policy and Review 27. New Directions for Understanding Transportation and Land UseEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1989
- Jobs and Commercial Office Development: Do New Offices Generate New Jobs?Economic Development Quarterly, 1988
- An Empirical Analysis of the Commute to Work Patterns of Males and Females in Two-Earner HouseholdsUrban Studies, 1986
- The Distribution of Population and Employment in a Polycentric City: The Case of Los AngelesEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1986
- Autos, Transit, and the Sprawl of Los Angeles: The 1920sJournal of the American Planning Association, 1984
- THE ECONOMICS OF CARPOOLSEconomic Inquiry, 1984
- Measuring Transportation System EffectivenessJournal of Urban Affairs, 1983
- Pricing Urban Transportation A Critique of Current PolicyJournal of the American Planning Association, 1981