Comparison of Three Statistical Computer Programs in Teaching Analysis of Variance
- 1 June 1985
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Educational Technology Systems
- Vol. 13 (4) , 237-247
- https://doi.org/10.2190/jldj-0lpc-7lfd-j00x
Abstract
Subjects analyzed data from typical ANOVA designs using three different computer programs. Several measures of cost, completion, and ease of program use were recorded and compared in a repeated measures Latin square design. Within time constraints and support that simulate an instructional setting, subjects could not answer the research questions using two traditional computer packages, but subjects completed all analyses using an interactive personal computer program designed to minimize computer-related difficulties. Such results can be useful in guiding design of instructional strategies and computer programs.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A methodology for interactive evaluation of user reactions to software packages: an empirical analysis of system performance, interaction, and run timeInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1984
- GANOVA: A General Personal Computer Program for Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of VarianceThe American Statistician, 1984
- A Comparison of Factor Analysis Programs in SPSS, BMDP, and SASPsychometrika, 1983
- The role of excursions in interactive systemsInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1983
- Published by Elsevier ,1983
- Problem Complexity and the Transfer of Strategies in Computer-presented ProblemsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1983
- Effectiveness of a Computer-Based Reading Comprehension Program for AdultsJournal of Educational Technology Systems, 1982
- Using an Interactive Computer System to Teach Statistical Methods in EducationJournal of Educational Technology Systems, 1982
- Evaluating the “friendliness” of a timesharing systemACM SIGSOC Bulletin, 1981
- An Appraisal of Least Squares Programs for the Electronic Computer from the Point of View of the UserJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967