The Academic Motivation Profile for Undergraduate Student Use in Evaluating College Courses
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Educational Research
- Vol. 88 (4) , 220-227
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1995.9941303
Abstract
Even though student ratings of instructors are widely used across college campuses, few instruments have the necessary psychometric properties of reliability and validity to permit the decisions for which they are often used. Further, these instruments are rarely based on theory. This research describes a new instrument, the Academic Motivation Profile, that is derived from theories of motivation. The instrument's development, psychometric properties, and its potential uses for improving instruction are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
- SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND USEFUL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHINGBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
- Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity StudiesReview of Educational Research, 1981
- On the Effectiveness of Students’ Evaluative Feedback to University InstructorsReview of Educational Research, 1979
- The Generalized Expectancy for Success Scale: A new measure.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
- THE GENERALIZABILITY OF STUDENT RATINGS OF INSTRUCTION: ESTIMATION OF THE TEACHER AND COURSE COMPONENTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1978
- Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses: A review and analysisResearch in Higher Education, 1977
- Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 1977
- Intrinsic MotivationPublished by Springer Nature ,1975
- Drives and the C. N. S. (conceptual nervous system).Psychological Review, 1955