The Performance of Dimtest When Latent Trait and Item Difficulty Distributions Differ
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 24 (1) , 82-94
- https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216000241005
Abstract
This monte carlo study examined DIMTEST for unidimensional and two-dimensional data that exhibited ceiling effects. These effects were generated through changes in the location and scale of the θ distribution when the item difficulty (b) distribution was held constant at b ~ N(0,1). Results indicated that the power of DIMTEST was reduced as the location shifted upward and the scale shifted downward. This held only when the AT1 items were selected using principal axis factor analysis. When AT1 items were selected using expert opinion, the procedure was only slightly affected by changes in location and scale. However, it is unclear how successful the use of expert judgment will be in applied settings.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using an Approximate Chi‐Square Statistic to Test the Number of Dimensions Underlying the Responses to a Set of ItemsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1996
- An Assessment of Stout's Index of Essential UnidimensionalityApplied Psychological Measurement, 1996
- Full-Information Item Factor AnalysisApplied Psychological Measurement, 1988
- Assessing the Dimensionality of a Set of Test ItemsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1986
- Robustness of IRT Parameter Estimation to Violations of the Unidimensionality AssumptionJournal of Educational Statistics, 1986
- Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and ltenlsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1985
- Item Response TheoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- An Empirical Study of Various Indices for Determining UnidimensionalityMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1984
- Application of Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models to Multidimensional DataApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- Dimensionality, bias, independence and measurement scale problems in latent trait test score modelsBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1980