Using the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) Model in a Statewide Prevention Initiative
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Health Promotion Practice
- Vol. 2 (4) , 302-309
- https://doi.org/10.1177/152483990100200408
Abstract
Getting to Outcomes: Methods and Tools for Planning, Evaluation, and Accountability (GTO) was developed as a hands-on guide to help practitioners plan, implement, and evaluate their programs to achieve results. The GTO manual uses worksheets and case examples to guide practitioners in answering 10 accountability questions about needs and resources, goals, evidencebased practices, fit, capacity, plan, implementation, outcome evaluation, continuous quality improvement, and sustainability. Addressing these questions will help programs achieve positive outcomes because the accountability questions include the elements of successful programming. GTO is thought to be most effective when implemented as a system in which all the stakeholders (e.g., funders, program operators, evaluators) follow the GTO model together. This article briefly describes the GTO model and the accountability questions and provides an example of a statewide initiative that is using the GTO model in a comprehensive grant-making system.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empowerment Evaluation: An Introduction to Theory and PracticePublished by SAGE Publications ,2012
- Getting to outcomes: a results-based approach to accountabilityEvaluation and Program Planning, 2000
- Framing the evaluation of health and human service programs in community settings: Assessing progressNew Directions for Evaluation, 1999
- Project DARE: No effects at 10-year follow-up.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1999
- An ecological assessment of community‐based interventions for prevention and health promotion: Approaches to measuring community coalitionsAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 1996
- Participatory Evaluation: Towards a Transformation of Assessment for Women’s Studies Programs and ProjectsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1988