A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants
Top Cited Papers
- 17 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Sex Roles
- Vol. 57 (7-8) , 509-514
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4
Abstract
Letters of recommendation are central to the hiring process. However, gender stereotypes could bias how recommenders describe female compared to male applicants. In the current study, text analysis software was used to examine 886 letters of recommendation written on behalf of 235 male and 42 female applicants for either a chemistry or biochemistry faculty position at a large U.S. research university. Results revealed more similarities than differences in letters written for male and female candidates. However, recommenders used significantly more standout adjectives to describe male as compared to female candidates. Letters containing more standout words also included more ability words and fewer grindstone words. Research is needed to explore how differences in language use affect perceivers’ evaluations of female candidates.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009
- Translating subjective language in letters of recommendation: the case of the sexist professorEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2007
- Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical FacultyDiscourse & Society, 2003
- The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic WomenJournal of Social Issues, 2001
- Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women's Ascent Up the Organizational LadderJournal of Social Issues, 2001
- Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.Psychological Review, 1995
- The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicantsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1988
- Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987