Care of Patients with a Low Probability of Acute Myocardial Infarction
- 17 May 1984
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 310 (20) , 1301-1307
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198405173102006
Abstract
We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to examine the clinical and economic consequences of alternatives to admission to a coronary-care unit for patients who have a relatively low probability of acute myocardial infarction. Despite the fact that all our assumptions were slanted to favor the current standard policy of admission to a coronary-care unit, our analysis shows that admission to an intermediate-care unit providing resuscitative facilities and prophylactic lidocaine is highly cost effective.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coronary care units. A perspective on their epidemiologic impactInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- A RANDOMISED TRIAL OF HOME-VERSUS-HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1978
- Teesside coronary survey: an epidemiological study of acute attacks of myocardial infarction.BMJ, 1976
- Myocardial infarction: a comparison between home and hospital care for patients.BMJ, 1976
- Lidocaine in the Prevention of Primary Ventricular FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974
- ACUTE PHASE OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1971
- BENEFITS OBTAINED BY THE INTRODUCTION OF A CORONARY‐CARE UNITActa Medica Scandinavica, 1971
- MORTALITY IN A CORONARY-CARE UNIT ANALYSED BY A NEW CORONARY PROGNOSTIC INDEXThe Lancet, 1969
- Acute myocardial infarction. Influence of a coronary care unitArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1968