The effects of delay in standard treatment due to induction chemotherapy in two randomized prospective studies
Open Access
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 97 (4) , 407-412
- https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198704000-00002
Abstract
It is often suggested that tumors will respond to induction chemotherapy and result in improved survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Two regimens of induction chemotherapy were studied in separate randomized, prospective trials over the last 6 years. Eighty‐three patients with advanced disease were entered into the first study (43/chemotherapy; 40/control), and 60 into the second (27/chemotherapy; 33/control). Patient randomization was stratified by stage (III/IV) and site (oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, paranasal sinuses). The first study utilized bleomycin, Cytoxan,® methotrexate and 5‐fluorouracil in two cycles (one cycle if no tumor response), followed by standard treatment which consisted of combined irradiation and surgery or, in some instances, primary irradiation alone. The second study utilized cisplatin and 5‐fluorouracil in three cycles prior to standard treatment. An objective tumor response to chemotherapy was observed in 68% in the first study and 85% in the second. The patient survival in both studies @ 24 months in the first; @ 19 in the second) was better in the control than that in the experimental groups (43% to 31%; 69% to 46%). In the second study, the average length of delay of standard treatment was longer than in the first study (95 daysvs.66 days;P<.02). Results combining theP‐values of both studies indicate that the relative risk of having persistent disease was 2.9 times greater for patients who received chemotherapy. While toxicity to chemotherapy was not a factor in survival, the number of patients who withdrew from the studies and those who did not comply with treatment were greater in the chemotherapy groups. Except for new drug regimens of exceptional promise, it is recommended that future studies be designed so that chemotherapy is given concurrent with, or following the completion of standard treatment.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized study of adjuvant chemotherapy for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tractInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1986
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast CancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1985
- Maintenance Chemotherapy for High-Risk Patients: A Preliminary ReportJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1985
- Chemotherapy in Head and Neck CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer: An updateThe American Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Chemotherapy Before Radiotherapy and/or Surgery for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and NeckJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1981
- Methotrexate treatment of squamous-cell head and neck cancers: dose-response evaluation.BMJ, 1981
- Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced tumors of the head and neckThe American Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Adjuvant intravenous methotrexate or definitive radiotherapy alone for advanced squamous cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, supraglottic larynx or hypopharynx: Concluding report of an rtog randomized trial on 638 patientsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1980
- Chemotherapy of head and neck cancerHead & Neck Surgery, 1978