Motivational Effects of Cannabinoids and Opioids on Food Reinforcement Depend on Simultaneous Activation of Cannabinoid and Opioid Systems
- 6 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Neuropsychopharmacology
- Vol. 30 (11) , 2035-2045
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300720
Abstract
Strong functional interactions exist between endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems. Here, we investigated whether cannabinoid–opioid interactions modulate motivational effects of food reinforcement. In rats responding for food under a progressive-ratio schedule, the maximal effort (break point) expended to obtain 45 mg pellets depended on the level of food deprivation, with free-feeding reducing break points and food-deprivation increasing break points. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 0.3–5.6 mg/kg intrapeitoneally (i.p.)) and morphine (1–10 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently increased break points for food reinforcement, while the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant (SR-141716A; 0.3–3 mg/kg i.p.) and the preferential mu-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (0.3–3 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently decreased break points. THC and morphine only increased break points when food was delivered during testing, suggesting that these treatments directly influenced reinforcing effects of food, rather than increasing behavior in a nonspecific manner. Effects of THC were blocked by rimonabant and effects of morphine were blocked by naloxone, demonstrating that THC's effects depended on cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation and morphine's effects depended on opioid-receptor activation. Furthermore, THC's effects were blocked by naloxone and morphine's effects were blocked by rimonabant, demonstrating that mu-opioid receptors were involved in the effects of THC and cannabinoid CB1 receptors were involved in the effects of morphine on food-reinforced behavior. Thus, activation of both endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems appears to jointly facilitate motivational effects of food measured under progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement and this facilitatory modulation appears to critically depend on interactions between these two systems. These findings support the proposed therapeutic utility of cannabinoid agonists and antagonists in eating disorders.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endocannabinoids and food consumption: comparisons with benzodiazepine and opioid palatability-dependent appetiteEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 2004
- Cannabinoid receptor and WIN 55 212‐2‐stimulated [35S]‐GTPγS binding in the brain of mu‐, delta‐ and kappa‐opioid receptor knockout miceEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2003
- Tetrahydrocannabinol and endocannabinoids in feeding and appetitePharmacology & Therapeutics, 2002
- Cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice fail to self-administer morphine but not other drugs of abuseBehavioural Brain Research, 2001
- Appetite suppression and weight loss after the cannabinoid antagonist SR 141716Life Sciences, 1998
- Selective inhibition of sucrose and ethanol intake by SR 141716, an antagonist of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptorsPsychopharmacology, 1997
- A Critique of Fixed and Progressive Ratio Schedules Used to Examine the Neural Substrates of Drug ReinforcementPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1997
- Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol produces naloxone-blockable enhancement of presynaptic basal dopamine efflux in nucleus accumbens of conscious, freely-moving rats as measured by intracerebral microdialysisPsychopharmacology, 1990
- Basic Mechanisms of Opioids’ Effects on Eating and DrinkingPublished by Springer Nature ,1990
- Cannabis: Effects on hunger and thirstBehavioral Biology, 1975