Survival in 2367 Zidovudine-Treated Patients According to Use of Other Nucleoside Analogue Drugs
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 17 (3) , 239-244
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00042560-199803010-00009
Abstract
To evaluate survival according to use of different nucleoside drugs in a routine clinical setting, we studied a large group of zidovudine-treated patients seen in clinics across Europe. A total of 3128 subjects was recruited to the observational, prospective EuroSIDA study in May 1994. These were consecutive patients (up to a predefined limit) seen at outpatient clinics in 37 centers from 16 European countries and followed at 6-month intervals by use of standardized forms completed by clinicians at the respective centers. This report concerns 2367 subjects who began antiretroviral therapy with a regime that included zidovudine either before study entry or during the course of follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted, with use of other antiretroviral drugs, CD4 count, and date of development of AIDS fitted as time-dependent covariates. Survival times from start of therapy were left truncated at study entry to avoid survival bias. In addition to zidovudine, antiretroviral drugs used included didanosine (ddl) (n = 1119; median 1.6 years after starting zidovudine), dideoxycytidine (ddC) (n = 592; median 1.9 years after starting zidovudine), stavudine (d4T) (n = 241; median 2.9 years after starting zidovudine) and lamivudine (3TC) (n = 331; median 2.7 years after starting zidovudine). Of the 2367 patients, 613 died during follow-up. Overall, risk of death was reduced in those zidovudine-treated patients who began at least one other nucleoside analogue drug with or after taking zidovudine (relative hazard [RH], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.72, adjusting for CD4 count, development of AIDS, and age). Fitting each drug separately, there was a larger association with reduced mortality for starting 3TC (RH, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.62) than for starting ddI (RH, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93), ddC (RH, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.92) or d4T (RH, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.91). These results suggest that the beneficial effect of nucleoside combination therapy identified in controlled trials can be seen in routine clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regional Differences in Use of Antiretroviral Agents and Primary Prophylaxis in 3122 European HIV-Infected PatientsJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1997
- Randomised trial of addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to zidovudine-containing regimens for patients with HIV-1 infection: the CAESAR trialThe Lancet, 1997
- USE OF OBSERVATIONAL DATA, INCLUDING SURVEILLANCE STUDIES, FOR EVALUATING AIDS THERAPIESStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- A Trial Comparing Nucleoside Monotherapy with Combination Therapy in HIV-Infected Adults with CD4 Cell Counts from 200 to 500 per Cubic MillimeterNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Therapy for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection — What Have We Learned?New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Zidovudine Alone or in Combination with Didanosine or Zalcitabine in HIV-Infected Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome or Fewer Than 200 CD4 Cells per Cubic MillimeterNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Delta: a randomised double-blind controlled trial comparing combinations of zidovudine plus didanosine or zalcitabine with zidovudine alone in HIV-infected individualsThe Lancet, 1996
- Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1996. Recommendations of an international panel. International AIDS Society-USAPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Survival in HIV-Infected Patients Who Have Received Zidovudine: Comparison of Combination Therapy with Sequential Monotherapy and Continued Zidovudine MonotherapyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- The need for randomization in the study of intended effectsStatistics in Medicine, 1983