Petrographic evidence shows that pottery exchange between the Olmec and their neighbors was two-way
Top Cited Papers
- 9 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 102 (32) , 11213-11218
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505117102
Abstract
Petrographic thin sections of pottery from five Formative Mexican archaeological sites show that exchanges of vessels between highland and lowland chiefly centers were reciprocal, or two-way. These analyses contradict recent claims that the Gulf Coast was the sole source of pottery carved with iconographic motifs. Those claims were based on neutron activation, which, by relying on chemical elements rather than actual minerals, has important limitations in its ability to identify nonlocal pottery from within large data sets. Petrography shows that the ceramics in question (and hence their carved motifs) have multiple origins and were widely traded.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implications of new petrographic analysis for the Olmec “mother culture” modelProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- Olmec Pottery Production and Export in Ancient Mexico Determined Through Elemental AnalysisScience, 2005
- Excavation at San José Mogote 1Published by University of Michigan Library ,2005
- A Pot is Not a Rock: A Reply to Neff, Glascock, Bishop, and BlackmanAmerican Antiquity, 1996
- Early Formative Pottery of the Valley of OaxacaPublished by University of Michigan Library ,1994
- Tlapacoya pottery in the Museum collection.Published by Smithsonian Institution ,1967