Memory for Lists of Sounds by the Bottle-Nosed Dolphin: Convergence of Memory Processes with Humans?
- 4 February 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 195 (4277) , 501-503
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.835012
Abstract
After listening to a list of as many as six discriminably different 2-second sounds, a bottle-nosed dolphin classified a subsequent probe sound as either "old" (from the list) or "new." The probability of recognizing an old probe was close to 1.0 if it matched the most recent sound in the list and decreased sigmoidally for successively earlier list sounds. Memory span was estimated to be at least four sounds. Overall probabilities of correctly classifying old and new probes corresponded closely, as if recognition decisions were made according to an optimum maximum likelihood criterion. The data bore many similarities to data obtained from humans tested on probe recognition tasks.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Matching to successive samples: A multiple-unit memory task with rhesus monkeysBehavior Research Methods, 1975
- Underwater frequency discrimination in the bottlenosed dolphin (1–140 kHz) and the human (1–8 kHz)The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975
- Interference and auditory short-term memory in the bottlenosed dolphinLearning & Behavior, 1975
- Time, interference, and rate of presentation in short-term recognition memory for itemsJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1970
- Forgetting: Interference or decay?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- Probability matching as a basis for detection and recognition decisions.Psychological Review, 1970
- Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control ProcessesPsychology of Learning and Motivation, 1968
- Decision theory, the pigeon, and the psychophysical function.Psychological Review, 1967
- Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memoryJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966
- Primary memory.Psychological Review, 1965