Antiviral Therapies for Herpes Zoster Infections
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in PharmacoEconomics
- Vol. 18 (2) , 95-104
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200018020-00001
Abstract
Antiviral treatment of herpes zoster is controversial because of uncertain benefits and relatively high costs. Most studies show that antiviral therapy lessens acute herpes zoster symptoms and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Current clinical recommendations support antiviral treatment of severely symptomatic herpes zoster in all adults, and mild herpes zoster in those 50 or 60 years of age or older. However, it is unclear if these recommended strategies are cost effective. Published studies of herpes zoster costs and the effect of antiviral therapy on costs and quality of life have significant variation in study design and results, as well as many shortcomings in the data. Thus, definitive economic recommendations cannot be made based on the present data. Another approach, which we have used, is to develop a ‘reference case’ analysis using decision-analysis techniques and the available data to estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of antiviral treatment in patients of differing age and herpes zoster severity. In the baseline analysis, parameter values and assumptions were consistently slightly biased against antiviral use. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).We assumed that antiviral treatment did not change PHN risk, but decreased PHN duration in patients older than 50 years. PHN risk increased with age and with acute herpes zoster severity as seen in published data. Mild acute herpes zoster was assumed to have a utility value of 0.9 and severe acute herpes zoster a value of 0.7 on a scale where 0 = death and 1 = perfect health. Treating mildly symptomatic acute herpes zoster cost $US89 200/QALY gained in 40-year-olds, $US47 700/QALY in 60-year-olds and $US40 700/QALY in 70- year-olds (1995 values). Results were most sensitive to variation of antiviral costs (baseline $US134), but changes in acute symptom relief, PHN risk, duration, costs and utility, and antiviral effect on PHN duration increased costs/QALY above $US50 000 in 60- and 70-year-olds in extremes of parameter ranges. However, no variation resulted in treatment of mild illness in 40-year-olds to fall below $US50 000/QALY gained. Treatment of severe acute herpes zoster cost $US29 700, $US18 000 and $US16 500/QALY gained in 40-, 60- and 70-year-olds, respectively. Results were sensitive to variation of antiviral costs (>$US225) and acute symptom relief (<21%) in 40-year-olds. Based on this analysis, antiviral therapy of herpes zoster seems economically justifiable for mildly symptomatic acute herpes zoster in patients aged 50 years and older, and for severely symptomatic acute herpes zoster in all adults.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economic Evaluation of Antiviral Therapy for the Treatment of Herpes Zoster in Immunocompetent AdultsPharmacoEconomics, 1997
- Postherpetic Neuralgia — Pathogenesis, Treatment, and PreventionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Cost Effectiveness of Thrombolytic Therapy with Tissue Plasminogen Activator as Compared with Streptokinase for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Recognition and Treatment of ShinglesDrugs, 1994
- The Cost of Treatment for Post-Herpetic Neuralgia in the UKPharmacoEconomics, 1994
- Proposed classification of herpes zoster painThe Lancet, 1994
- A Randomized Trial of Acyclovir for 7 Days or 21 Days with and without Prednisolone for Treatment of Acute Herpes ZosterNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Shingles. Sorrows, salves, and solutionsJAMA, 1993
- Lack of effect of acyclovir on postherpetic neuralgia.BMJ, 1989
- Decision AnalysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987