The subjective tempo difference between interaural and monaural sequences as a function of sequence length
- 1 September 1983
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 34 (5) , 465-469
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203062
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Auditory spatial alternation transforms auditory time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1983
- Auditory spatial alternation transforms auditory time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1983
- Interaural and monaural clicks and clocks: Tempo difference versus attention switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982
- Attention switching is not a fatigable process: Methodological comments on Axelrod and Guzy (1972).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980
- Attention switching is not a fatigable process: Methodological comments on Axelrod and Guzy (1972).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980
- Auditory streaming is cumulative.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978
- Auditory streaming is cumulative.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978
- Interaural attention shifting as response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972
- Underestimation of dichotic click rates: Results using methods of absolute estimation and constant stimuliPsychonomic Science, 1968
- Perceived Rate of Monotic and Dichotically Alternating ClicksThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967