Widespread Use and Frequent Detection of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Wetlands of Canada's Prairie Pothole Region
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (3) , e92821
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092821
Abstract
Neonicotinoids currently dominate the insecticide market as seed treatments on Canada's major Prairie crops (e.g., canola). The potential impact to ecologically significant wetlands in this dominantly agro-environment has largely been overlooked while the distribution of use, incidence and level of contamination remains unreported. We modelled the spatial distribution of neonicotinoid use across the three Prairie Provinces in combination with temporal assessments of water and sediment concentrations in wetlands to measure four active ingredients (clothianidin, thiamethoxam, imidacloprid and acetamiprid). From 2009 to 2012, neonicotinoid use was increasing; by 2012, applications covered an estimated ∼11 million hectares (44% of Prairie cropland) with >216,000 kg of active ingredients. Thiamethoxam, followed by clothianidin, were the dominant seed treatments by mass and area. Areas of high neonicotinoid use were identified as high density canola or soybean production. Water sampled four times from 136 wetlands (spring, summer, fall 2012 and spring 2013) across four rural municipalities in Saskatchewan similarly revealed clothianidin and thiamethoxam in the majority of samples. In spring 2012 prior to seeding, 36% of wetlands contained at least one neonicotinoid. Detections increased to 62% in summer 2012, declined to 16% in fall, and increased to 91% the following spring 2013 after ice-off. Peak concentrations were recorded during summer 2012 for both thiamethoxam (range: <LOQ - 1490 ng/L, canola) and clothianidin (range: <LOQ – 3110 ng/L, canola). Sediment samples collected during the same period rarely (6%) contained neonicotinoid concentrations (which did not exceed 20 ng/L). Wetlands situated in barley, canola and oat fields consistently contained higher mean concentrations of neonicotinoids than in grasslands, but no individual crop singularly influenced overall detections or concentrations. Distribution maps indicate neonicotinoid use is increasing and becoming more widespread with concerns for environmental loading, while frequently detected neonicotinoid concentrations in Prairie wetlands suggest high persistence and transport into wetlands.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Macro-Invertebrate Decline in Surface Water Polluted with ImidaclopridPLOS ONE, 2013
- Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessmentEcotoxicology, 2012
- Multiple Routes of Pesticide Exposure for Honey Bees Living Near Agricultural FieldsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Agricultural landscape simplification and insecticide use in the Midwestern United StatesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Overview of the Status and Global Strategy for NeonicotinoidsJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010
- Structural and functional responses of benthic invertebrates to imidacloprid in outdoor stream mesocosmsEnvironmental Pollution, 2009
- Groundwater-wetland ecosystem interaction in the semiarid glaciated plains of North AmericaHydrogeology Journal, 2008
- Neonicotinoids—from zero to hero in insecticide chemistryPest Management Science, 2008
- Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protectionPest Management Science, 2008
- Pesticides in surface water runoff in south‐eastern New York State, USA: seasonal and stormflow effects on concentrationsPest Management Science, 2004