Acute pain teams and the management of postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
- 4 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 41 (3) , 261-273
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02527.x
Abstract
Background. The introduction of acute pain teams (APTs) in every hospital performing surgery in the UK has been recommended in order to reduce postoperative pain. However, recent evidence suggests that many APTs are under‐resourced. Purchasers may be more prepared to invest in these services if they are persuaded that they result in measurable improvements in patient outcomes. Aim. A systematic review of the literature and meta‐analysis were performed to determine the effectiveness of APTs in improving the quality of analgesia and other postoperative outcomes of adult patients undergoing surgery. Methods. A broad search strategy using the terms ‘pain team’ and ‘pain service’ was adapted for a variety of databases. Key journals were hand‐searched and reference lists of selected reports were reviewed. Subject experts and study authors were contacted. Studies describing the impact of the APT/acute pain service (APS) on postoperative pain relief, other postoperative outcomes or the processes of postoperative pain were included. Study quality was assessed using a multidimensional instrument. A broad qualitative overview of the included studies was conducted. Continuous outcome data for pain in the first 24 hours postoperatively (in one case worst pain at 24–48 hours) were pooled. Results. Fifteen studies were included in the review. There were considerable differences in study design and quality, the nature of the APT and the outcomes measured. Of the nine studies measuring pain, it was possible to present data as Standardized Mean Differences for only four studies. Quantitative synthesis indicates a statistically significant overall estimate of effect using a fixed effects model only. Limitations. Only published studies in English were included. Study inclusion decisions and data extraction were performed by one reviewer only. Conclusion. There is insufficient robust research to assess the impact of APTs on postoperative outcomes of adult patients or on the processes of postoperative pain relief.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic Reviews of Observational StudiesPublished by Wiley ,2001
- Anesthesia-based pain services improve the quality of postoperative pain managementPain, 1999
- Management of Patient-Controlled AnalgesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1997
- National provision of acute pain servicesAnaesthesia, 1996
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklistsControlled Clinical Trials, 1995
- Shaping attitudes to postoperative pain relief: The role of the acute pain teamJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1995
- Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Lancet, 1991
- THE FIRST YEAR'S EXPERIENCE OF AN ACUTE PAIN SERVICEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1991