Interpretation and estimation of summary ratios under heterogeneity
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 1 (3) , 217-227
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780010304
Abstract
Of the several types of summary odds ratios in use in epidemiology, only those proposed by Mantel and Haenszel and Miettinen do not assume homogeneity (constancy) of stratum‐specific parameters. Under heterogeneity, Miettinen's estimators consistently estimate meaningful epidemiologic parameters, whereas the asymptotic expectation of the Mantel‐Haenszel odds ratio varies according to irrelevant features of the sampling design. Although one can modify the Mantel‐Haenszel summary to overcome the latter problem, one can also extend the Miettinen estimators to sparse data and thus limit the use of Mantel‐Haenszel summaries to situations in which the homogeneity hypothesis is reasonable. This paper provides formulae for the extended Miettinen estimators and large‐sample variances and confidence limits for summary ratios under heterogeneity.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONFOUNDING: ESSENCE AND DETECTION1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1981
- Asymptotic efficiency of general noniterative estimators of common relative riskBiometrika, 1981
- Odds ratio estimators when the data are sparseBiometrika, 1981
- On summary estimators of relative riskJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981
- Multivariate estimation of exposure-specific incidence from case-control studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981
- Summary RatesPublished by JSTOR ,1980
- The Large Sample Variance of the Mantel-Haenszel Estimator of a Common Odds RatioPublished by JSTOR ,1979
- STANDARDIZATION OF RISK RATIOSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1972
- Analysis of Categorical Data by Linear ModelsPublished by JSTOR ,1969