Estimating the cost and health status consequences of treatment with TNF antagonists in patients with psoriatic arthritis
Open Access
- 16 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Rheumatology
- Vol. 45 (8) , 1029-1038
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel147
Abstract
Objectives. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has been shown to improve the outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We estimate the long-term impact on health status of prescribing the TNF antagonist etanercept, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness in a health economic model. Methods. The relationship between disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and health state utility was explored to estimate the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the TNF antagonist etanercept. A model was then used to compare sequences of treatments for PsA after failure of two conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). One arm commences on etanercept therapy and this is compared with a strategy commencing with combination therapy of methotrexate and ciclosporin and another commencing with leflunomide. Individual patient data from Phase III etanercept trials is used to populate the model supported by published evidence from extensive literature searches. By incorporating a life table specific for a PsA population, and using a number of evidence- and expert opinion-based assumptions for disease progression, the model was extended beyond the trial duration to a 10-yr time horizon. Cost offsets were produced by avoiding surgery through delayed progression; drug and monitoring costs were also modelled. Results. Over the 10 yrs, modelled etanercept treatment gave 0.82 more QALYs when compared with combination therapy with methotrexate and ciclosporin, and 0.65 more QALYs in comparison with leflunomide. This equates to a central estimate for the cost per QALY of £28 189 and £28 189 for ciclosporin and leflunomide, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated this could vary by as much as ±28%. Conclusions. With limited data currently available, the potential cost-effectiveness of etanercept in DMARD failures for adults with PsA appears encouraging. The result for other TNF antagonists will depend on how their relative efficacy and drug price compares with etanercept. A number of limitations are described and priorities for further research suggested.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost effectiveness of adalimumab in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in SwedenAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2005
- Modelling the cost-effectiveness of etanercept in adults with rheumatoid arthritis in the UKRheumatology, 2003
- PsoriasisThe Lancet, 2003
- The cost‐effectiveness of infliximab (Remicade®) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden and the United Kingdom based on the ATTRACT studyRheumatology, 2003
- Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 54 weeks of infliximab for rheumatoid arthritisThe American Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The direct cost of care for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in the United StatesJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2002
- Historical background and epidemiologyBailliere's Clinical Rheumatology, 1994
- PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (PA): A CLINICAL, IMMUNOLOGICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL STUDY OF 180 PATIENTSRheumatology, 1991
- Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisalJournal of Health Economics, 1986
- Measurement of patient outcome in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980